So Gore wins the Nobel Peace Prize. For what exactly? A documentary about climate change that is allegedly loaded with inaccuracies?
Let’s forget the inaccuracies for a moment. How does a movie about climate change fulfill the purpose of the award?
According to wikipedia (yes, I know, far from the pantheon of truthfulness, but I think they have this correct), Alfred Nobel’s will stated that the Nobel Peace Prize is to be awarded
to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.
Please enlighten me as to how making a documentary about climate change accomplishes any of that. It’s absurd.
Not that any of it matters anyway. The Nobel Laureates lost all credibility when they awarded the prize to a terrorist.
